Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version
48-2007-CA-014233-O Page 1 of 8 π's Motion for Final Default Judgment
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
WRIGHT ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, LLC and WRIGHT
ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
BRITNEY SPEARS and BRITNEY
TOURING, INC.,
Defendants. /
CASE NO: 48-2007-CA-014233-O
DIVISION: 32
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT
AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Plaintiffs, WRIGHT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC and WRIGHT
ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. (hereinafter referred to collectively as
“Plaintiffs” or “WEG”), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.500 and 1.560, respectfully
requests the entry of an order granting Plaintiffs a final default judgment against
Defendants, BRITNEY SPEARS (hereinafter SPEARS”) and BRITNEY
TOURING, INC. (hereinafter “BTI”) (collectively referred to as “Defendants”), as to
liability on Count I (Breach of Contract) and Count II (Accounting); and order that
discovery in aid of execution proceeds, and that the Court reserve ruling as to the
amount and award of damages, which shall be entered following an Accounting; and
in support thereof states:
Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version http://www.neevia.com
48-2007-CA-014233-O Page 2 of 8 π's Motion for Final Default Judgment
1. Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against the Defendants in the Ninth Judicial
Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida on October 26, 2007 (“Composite
Exhibit Aincludes the Complaint and attached exhibits).
2. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges at Count I (Breach of Contract) that
SPEARS and BTI have failed to pay WEG commissions, and at Count II
(Accounting) that SPEARS and BTI failed to account to WEG for management
commissions owed pursuant to paragraphs 6 and 8 of the Management Agreement
between WEG and SPEARS (attached hereto as Exhibit “Aof Composite Exhibit
A).
3. On November 1, 2007, service of process of the Summons, Complaint,
and Plaintiff’s discovery requests was perfected on SPEARS pursuant to the
Affidavit of Service (attached hereto as Exhibit B”).
4. SPEARS has failed to answer the Complaint or file a responsive
pleading to the same within twenty (20) days of the date of service of the Summons
and Complaint pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140 (a)(1) and has not filed a response to
date.
5. On November 1, 2007, personal service of process of the Summons,
Complaint, and Plaintiffs’ discovery requests was perfected on SPEARS, as the
President of BTI. (See Exhibit “B”)
Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version http://www.neevia.com
48-2007-CA-014233-O Page 3 of 8 π's Motion for Final Default Judgment
6. On November 9, 2007, service of process of the Summons, Complaint
and Plaintiffs’ discovery requests was also perfected on the Registered Agent for
BTI, Kim Glover for Corporation Service Company, pursuant to the Affidavit of
Service (attached hereto as ExhibitC”).
7. BTI has failed to answer the Complaint or file a responsive pleading to
the same within twenty (20) days of the date of service of the Summons and
Complaint pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140 (a)(1) and has not filed a response to
date.
8. On December 18, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Default against
SPEARS (attached hereto as ExhibitD”).
9. On December 18, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Default against
BTI (attached hereto as Exhibit “E”).
10. On December 18, 2007, the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Orange
County entered a Clerk's Default against SPEARS (attached hereto as ExhibitF”).
11. On December 18, 2007, the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Orange
County entered a Clerk's Default against BTI (attached hereto as Exhibit “G”).
12. On December 21, 2007, service of the Clerk’s Default was perfected on
the Registered Agent for BTI pursuant to the certified mail return receipt card
(attached hereto as Exhibit “H”).
Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version http://www.neevia.com
48-2007-CA-014233-O Page 4 of 8 π's Motion for Final Default Judgment
13. As of this date, the Defendants have still not filed and served an Answer
or responsive pleading, served any papers, or bothered to make any contact with the
Plaintiff, and a final default judgment should be entered as to SPEARS and BTI on
the issue of liability for Counts I and II.
14. Plaintiff also seeks an order permitting the discovery of any and all
documents and accounting records within the scope of “Gross Receipts” generated by
or to SPEARS, BTI, SPEARS’ Controlled Entities, and other entities unknown at this
time, which are subject to commissions due to WEG pursuant to paragraph 6 of the
Agreement which defines “Gross Receiptsaccountable to WEG:
The term Gross Receipts” as used herein shall mean any
and all compensation, in whatever form, which is paid,
payable, earned or accrued (and including any deferred
portion which may not actually be received until after the
termination of the Term hereof) in whole or in part, to
Artist, Artist’s family, heirs, executors, administrators,
assigns, or applied for Artist’s benefit, directly or indirectly
(for example, to any corporation, partnership or any other
entity in which Artist or any of the foregoing persons have
an interest), during the Term hereof, as a result of Artist’s
activities in the entertainment and related industries,
including, without limitation, motion pictures, television,
radio, recordings, theater, advertising, promotion, music
publishing, song writing, book publishing, video games,
multimedia, CD-Rom and all other new technologies now
known or hereinafter devised.
15. In addition to the above, Plaintiff specifically seeks an order compelling
the production of all requests in Plaintiff’s First Request for Production served upon
the Defendants along with the Plaintiff’s Complaint on November 1, 2007 (attached
Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version http://www.neevia.com
48-2007-CA-014233-O Page 5 of 8 π's Motion for Final Default Judgment
hereto as Exhibit I”).
MEMORANDUM OF LAW
A. Default Terminates Defendants’ Right To Defend Claim
1. Under Florida law, it has been well-established that once a default has
been entered against a party, that said party’s right to defend any issues related to its
claim, other than to contest the amount of damages, terminates and the defaulting
party admits the allegation pled in the complaint. Donohue v. Brightman, 939 So.2d
1164, (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2006) is instructive:
A default terminates the defending party’s right to further
defend, except to contest the amount of unliquidated
damages. Kaplan v. Morse, 870 So.2d 934, 936 (Fla. Dist.
Ct. App. 5th Dist. 2004); see also Henry P. Trawick, Jr.,
Florida Practice and Procedure § 25-2 (2005 ed.). When a
default is entered, the defaulting party admits all well-pled
factual allegations of the Complaint. State Farm Mutual
Auto Ins. Co. v. Horkheimer, 814 So.2d 1069, 1072 (Fla.
Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2001). [T]he entry of default
precludes a party from contesting the existence of
plaintiff’s claim and liability thereon. Thereafter, a party
has the right to contest damages caused by the party’s
wrong but no other issue. Fla. Bar v. Porter, 684 So.2d
810, 813 (Fla. 1996)(citations omitted).
2. Where no responsive pleadings or papers are filed by defendants prior
to default being entered, the default is properly entered without any notice. Moore v.
Schraw, 455 So.2d 605 (Fla. Dist. Crt. App. 5th Dist. 1984), citing Fla. R. Civ. P.
1.500(a).
3. No further proof in support of plaintiff’s allegations are necessary after
Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version http://www.neevia.com
48-2007-CA-014233-O Page 6 of 8 π's Motion for Final Default Judgment
default is entered. Wiseman v. Stocks, 527 So.2d 904 (Fla. Dist. Crt. App. 1st Dist.
1988).
B. Entry Of The Default Judgment
1. Final judgment after default may be entered by the court at any time.
Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.500(e). Notwithstanding Defendants’ admission of Plaintiff’s claims
via default, Plaintiff’s Complaint and evidence (attached exhibits) provide a
sufficient record to support an accounting.
C. Discovery In Aid Of Execution
1. This Court may order discovery from any person in aid of a judgment
pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.560(a). For example, the Court may order the
completion of form 1.977 (Fact Information Sheet) by the judgment debtor within 45
days. Where a claim is already determined to be valid by default judgment, a party
may take post-judgment depositions in aid of execution. Nobles v. Ring Power
Corporation, 531 So.2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1988).
2. Florida law allows judgment creditors liberal rights in aid of execution.
RPS, Inc. v. Travel Max International, Inc., 823 So.2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Crt. App. 4th
Dist. 2002), citing West’s F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.560(a).
3. Once a decree is entered on a complaint praying for a general
investigation of all the transactions between the parties, every item fairly embraced in
those transactions is properly considered within the scope even though not
Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version http://www.neevia.com
48-2007-CA-014233-O Page 7 of 8 π's Motion for Final Default Judgment
specifically mentioned in the pleading. King v. Bell, 54 Fla. 568, 45 So. 488 (Fla.
1907).
D. Reservation Of Final Judgment As To Damages
1. This Court may retain jurisdiction until a final determination of monies
due may be had in order to render a comprehensive final judgment. A-1 Truck
Rentals, Inc. v. Vilberg, 222 So.2d 442 (Fl Dist. Ct. App. 3rd Dist. 1969).
E. Due Diligence
1. The Plaintiffs have been diligent in their efforts to ensure that the
Defendants received proper notice by perfecting personal service of process of not
only the Summons and Complaint, but also the Motion for Default and the Clerk’s
Default on SPEARS as the President of BTI1.
2. Defendants have exhibited no due diligence at all, but have engaged in
dilatory and procrastinating behavior.
3. Furthermore, Plaintiffs have been diligent in their efforts to ensure that
the Defendants receive proper notice by perfecting personal service of the Summons
and Complaint on the Registered Agent for BTI and obtaining confirmation of the
Registered Agent’s receipt of the Motion for Default and Clerk’s Default by way of
certified mail return receipt requested.
V. Conclusion
Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version http://www.neevia.com
48-2007-CA-014233-O Page 8 of 8 π's Motion for Final Default Judgment
Plaintiffs prays this Court enter:
1. A Final Default Judgment in the instant case as to liability on Plaintiffs’
Count I (Breach of Contract) and Count II (Accounting) with this Court reserving
ruling on the amount of award of damages which shall be entered following an
Accounting; and
2. An order compelling discovery in aid of execution, including that
Defendants, their agents, representative and those in possession of Defendants
records produce all documents responsive to Plaintiff’s First Request for Production.
Dated: February 12, 2008 Respectfully Submitted,
_/s/ Clay M.
Clay M. Clay M.
Clay M. Townsend
TownsendTownsend
Townsend______
CLAY M. TOWNSEND, ESQ.
Florida Bar No.: 363375
KEITH MITNIK, ESQ.
Florida Bar No.: 436127
GREGORIO FRANCIS, ESQ.
Florida Bar No.: 8478
MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.
20 N. Orange Avenue, Ste. 1600
Orlando, FL 32801
PH: (407) 420-1414
Fax: (407) 425-8171
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished,
by certified mail, this 12th day of February, 2008, to: Britney Spears, 12095 Summit Circle,
Beverly Hills, CA 90210; Britney Spears, 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 1300, Los
Angeles, CA 90067-4114; and Britney Touring, Inc., c/o Corporation Service Company
(Registered Agent), 1201 Hays Street, Tallahassee, FL 32301-2525.
/s/ Clay M. Townsend
/s/ Clay M. Townsend/s/ Clay M. Townsend
/s/ Clay M. Townsend_____
Clay Townsend, Esquire
1 Service of SPEARS, while accompanied by her business manager, was videotaped and widely reported in the news
media.
Created by Neevia docuPrinter LT trial version http://www.neevia.com